Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 386/13 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine ownership acquisition by prescription claim.

Case Number V CSK 386/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal to review the lower court's decision on ownership acquisition by prescription. The applicant challenged the district court's ruling based on procedural errors and factual assessments regarding the possession duration. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine a claim for ownership acquisition by prescription or if the decision was based on a violation of the principle of equality of arms.

Keywords

AI generated
ownership acquisition by prescription cassation appeal acceptance procedural violation equality of arms principle Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 386/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 9 kwietnia 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z wniosku J. S.‎przy uczestnictwie Gminy W.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 9 kwietnia 2014 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 25 stycznia 2013 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE