Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 379/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal in museum payment dispute against defendant A.D.

Case Number V CSK 379/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the Museum against the Second Instance Court's judgment. The Museum sought payment from A.D., while the defendant argued against the liability or amount. The court decided to proceed with the review because the lower court's ruling required further examination of the legal issues.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court accepts a cassation appeal when the lower court's judgment violates the law or fails to address a crucial legal issue.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance museum payment dispute civil procedure law Supreme Court review legal violation standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 379/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 stycznia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Katarzyna Tyczka-Rote w sprawie z powództwa Muzeum […]. w O.‎przeciwko A. D.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 stycznia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 21 grudnia 2018 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE