Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 378/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether civil court properly applied law in debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 378/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the lower court's judgment. The plaintiffs argued that the civil court erred in its assessment of the debt obligations and applicable legal provisions. Consequently, the case was remanded for further examination by the appellate court to correct the alleged legal misapplication.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a violation of the law or failed to apply the law correctly, necessitating a remand for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance violation of law civil debt dispute remand for retrial application of law error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 378/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 stycznia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa K. S., D. S. i M. S.‎przeciwko D. P. i M. N.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 28 stycznia 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powodów od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w C.‎z dnia 18 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. akt V Ga (...), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE