Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 351/16 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a municipal debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 351/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerned a claim for payment by a municipality, with arguments focusing on the correct application of legal provisions regarding debt collection. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court correctly applied the law, even if the appeal is not fully admissible for immediate decision.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance municipal debt claim application of law review civil procedure code Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 351/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 grudnia 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosław Bączyk w sprawie z powództwa A. I.‎przeciwko Gminie K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 grudnia 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]z dnia 5 lutego 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.