Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 347/19 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding bank's refusal to pay debt based on statute of limitations defense.

Case Number V CSK 347/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiffs sought payment from the bank, which argued that the claim was time-barred under the Civil Code. The court upheld the lower court's decision, ruling that the statute of limitations had expired, thereby preventing the plaintiffs from recovering the debt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 118 k.c.; Art. 230 k.c.: The statute of limitations bars the enforcement of a claim if the limitation period has expired without interruption or suspension, resulting in the dismissal of the action.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations civil code time bar cassation appeal bank debt enforcement barred limitation period

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 118 k.c.
Art. 230 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 347/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 kwietnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz w sprawie z powództwa E. N., H. N., S. N.‎przeciwko […] Bank spółce akcyjnej z siedzibą w W.‎przy udziale Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 8 kwietnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powodów od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]z dnia 28 lutego 2019 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], podejmuje postępowanie.