Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 347/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank contract clauses are void for unfairness.

Case Number V CSK 347/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiffs argued that specific clauses in their bank contract were void due to unfairness, while the bank contested this claim. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the validity of the disputed contract terms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 4 ust. 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine a claim based on the invalidity of a contract clause due to unfairness.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance unfair contract terms bank contract validity consumer protection law contract clause invalidity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 4 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 347/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 lutego 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Wojciech Katner w sprawie z powództwa M. Z. i P. Z.‎przeciwko […] Bankowi […] S. A. w K.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 13 lutego 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powodów od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 8 marca 2018 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE