Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 334/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 334/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The case involves a dispute over payment obligations between the plaintiff P. S.A. in W. and the defendant J.S., where the appellate court previously ruled on the merits. The court decided to remand the case for further examination to determine if the lower courts correctly interpreted the applicable legal provisions regarding the debt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to apply the law correctly or if the judgment is contrary to the law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance incorrect application of law civil debt dispute Supreme Court remand procedural review standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 334/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 7 lutego 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z powództwa P. S.A. w W.‎przeciwko J.S.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 7 lutego 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 20 października 2017 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.