Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V CSK 32/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation complaints against administrative decisions regarding the invalidity of company resolutions.

Case Number V CSK 32/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted both cassation complaints filed by the plaintiff against the defendant company's administrative decisions. The core dispute involved challenges to the validity and non-existence of specific corporate resolutions made by the company. The court ruled to proceed with the review of these complaints to determine the legality of the contested administrative acts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court shall accept cassation complaints where the lower court failed to examine the legality of administrative decisions or where the lower court's judgment contradicts established legal principles regarding the validity of corporate resolutions.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation procedure administrative decisions company resolutions legal validity Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 32/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 maja 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Bogumiła Ustjanicz w sprawie z powództwa B. W.‎przeciwko H. Sp. z o.o. w W.‎o uchylenie uchwał, stwierdzenie nieważności, ustalenie nieistnienia i ustalenie bezskuteczności,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 14 maja 2019 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych: powódki i pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 11 lipca 2018 r., sygn. akt I AGa […], przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE