Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V CSK 292/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation complaints in construction contract dispute regarding payment obligations.

Case Number V CSK 292/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted both cassation complaints filed by the plaintiff and the intervening party for further review. The dispute involves a construction contract where the plaintiff sought payment from the defendant company, with a third party intervening. The court decided to proceed with the case because the lower court's judgment required clarification on specific legal interpretations regarding the contractual obligations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation complaints when the lower court's judgment involves a question of law requiring clarification or when the application of the law was incorrect.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation procedure construction contract payment obligations civil litigation third party intervention

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 292/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 listopada 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak w sprawie z powództwa W. Firmy Budowlanej Sp. z o.o. we W.‎przeciwko M. Sp. z o.o. Sp. komandytowej we W.‎z udziałem interwenienta ubocznego Przedsiębiorstwa Budowlanego J. Sp. z o.o. we W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 listopada 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej i interwenienta ubocznego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we W.‎z dnia 12 lipca 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa …/16, przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania.