Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 283/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a payment dispute.

Case Number V CSK 283/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerns a payment claim brought by a general partnership against a limited liability company. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court committed a procedural error or misapplied the law in the judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal payment dispute general partnership limited liability company procedural error review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 283/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 listopada 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa Przedsiębiorstwa Handlowego C. G.P., M.P. spółki jawnej w W.‎przeciwko Grupie [...] S.A. w K. ‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 16 listopada 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 24 stycznia 2017 r., sygn. akt V ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.