Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 260/16 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in the dispute.

Case Number V CSK 260/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involved a claim for payment between E. S.A. and S. Sp. z o.o., with the appellate court having previously ruled on the merits. The Supreme Court decided to remand the case for further examination rather than issuing a final ruling on the substantive claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court committed a procedural error or misapplied the law, necessitating a remand for further proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance misapplication of law procedural error review remand for further proceedings civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 260/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 9 stycznia 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Monika Koba w sprawie z powództwa E. S.A. w C.‎przeciwko S. […] Sp. z o.o. w M.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 9 stycznia 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 15 października 2015 r., sygn. akt V ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.