Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V CSK 258/20 AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed; court rejects insurer's argument that policy exclusion applies to intentional acts by insured.

Case Number V CSK 258/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the insurer against the appellate court's judgment in favor of the insured. The insured claimed coverage for damages caused by an intentional act, while the insurer argued that the policy explicitly excluded such intentional conduct. The court ruled that the exclusion clause did not apply because the insured's intent was directed at a third party, not the insured themselves, thereby upholding the lower court's decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 10 ust. 2 Kodeksu cywilnego: An insurance policy exclusion for intentional acts does not apply when the insured's intent is directed at a third party rather than the insured.

Keywords

AI generated
insurance contract intentional act exclusion clause third party intent cassation appeal civil liability coverage scope

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 10 ust. 2 Kodeksu cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 258/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 kwietnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Widło w sprawie z powództwa G. N.‎przeciwko Towarzystwu Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji (...) S.A. w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 28 kwietnia 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (...)‎z dnia 10 marca 2020 r., sygn. akt I AGa (...), 1. odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania, 2. nie obciąża powoda G. N. kosztami zastępstwa procesowego w postępowaniu kasacyjnym.