Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 217/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 217/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute involves a claim for payment between two companies, with the defendant arguing errors in the lower court's legal application. The court decided to refer the case back for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a significant error in the application of substantive or procedural law, necessitating a remittal for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance significant legal error remittal for retrial civil procedure code debt claim dispute appellate court judgment substantive law application

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 217/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 19 października 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Hubert Wrzeszcz w sprawie z powództwa ,,S…” sp. z o.o. w Ł.‎przeciwko ,,K…” Sp. z o.o. spółce komandytowej we W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 19 października 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we W.‎z dnia 28 listopada 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa […]/16, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.