Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 205/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal to examine museum's claim for payment against defendant.

Case Number V CSK 205/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the Museum against the Second Instance Court's judgment. The Museum sought payment from the defendant, while the defendant contested the claim's validity. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to examine the case if the lower court's decision requires further examination of the facts or law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance Supreme Court procedure museum payment claim civil litigation second instance review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 205/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 12 czerwca 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosław Bączyk w sprawie z powództwa Muzeum […] w O.‎przeciwko A. D.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 12 czerwca 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 3 kwietnia 2014 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE