Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 202/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal regarding payment dispute between companies with third-party intervention.

Case Number V CSK 202/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court admitted the third-party intervention's cassation appeal for further examination. The dispute involved a payment claim between two companies, with the intervening party challenging the lower court's judgment. The court decided to proceed with the appeal to review the legal errors in the first-instance ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit a cassation appeal filed by a third-party intervenor if the appeal concerns a legal issue relevant to the case and the intervenor has a legal interest in the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admission third party intervention payment dispute between companies legal interest requirement Supreme Court procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 202/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 20 listopada 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Wojciech Katner w sprawie z powództwa […] F. […] Sp. z o.o. w W.‎przeciwko M. Sp. z o.o. spółce komandytowej w W.‎z udziałem interwenienta ubocznego […] "J." […] Sp. z o.o. w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 20 listopada 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej interwenienta ubocznego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 22 listopada 2018 r., sygn. akt I AGa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE