Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 181/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 181/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in its assessment of the debt's validity and calculation methods. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination to determine if the legal application was flawed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a material error in the application of substantive or procedural law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal application of law material error civil procedure debt dispute remit for examination Supreme Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 181/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 30 listopada 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Katarzyna Tyczka-Rote w sprawie z powództwa A. z o.o. w S.‎przeciwko S. w S.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 30 listopada 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 30 stycznia 2020 r., sygn. akt I AGa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE