Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 180/13 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine jurisdictional dispute between civil and criminal proceedings.

Case Number V CSK 180/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant to resolve a jurisdictional conflict. The parties disputed whether the civil court or criminal court should handle the specific matter involving W. S., E. W., and C. X. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the correct forum.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 233 § 2 k.p.c.: When a conflict of jurisdiction arises between civil and criminal proceedings, the Supreme Court may accept the cassation appeal to determine the proper forum for the case.

Keywords

AI generated
conflict of jurisdiction civil and criminal proceedings cassation appeal acceptance forum determination Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 233 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 180/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 9 stycznia 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Dończyk w sprawie z powództwa W. S. i E. W.‎przeciwko C. X.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 9 stycznia 2014 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 24 stycznia 2013 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE