Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 176/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 176/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involved a claim for payment where the defendant argued the lower court erred in its legal assessment. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination rather than issuing a final ruling on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to apply the law correctly, thereby remitting the case for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance incorrect application of law remittal for retrial civil procedure code Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 176/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 listopada 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marian Kocon w sprawie z powództwa P. w W.‎przeciwko K. W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 listopada 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 7 stycznia 2020 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE