Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V CSK 172/13 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether civil liability for damages exists.

Case Number V CSK 172/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by plaintiffs P. K. and J. B. against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiffs sought payment for damages arising from a specific incident involving defendants B. B. and P. S.A. in Warsaw, arguing that the lower court failed to properly assess their civil liability claims. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the legal conditions for compensation were met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law regarding the existence of civil liability for damages.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance civil liability for damages Supreme Court jurisdiction plaintiff's claim assessment appellate court judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 172/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 20 grudnia 2013 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marian Kocon w sprawie z powództwa P. K. i J. B.‎przeciwko B. B. i P. S.A. w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 20 grudnia 2013 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powodów od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 12 września 2012 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE