Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V CSK 155/16 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for minor child while allowing it for adult plaintiffs in joint debt claim.

Case Number V CSK 155/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the minor plaintiff J.K. but allowed the appeals filed by the adult plaintiffs A.K. and P.K. The lower courts had ruled on a joint debt claim where the plaintiffs sought payment from defendants A.G. and D.G. The court distinguished the parties based on their legal capacity, noting that the minor's procedural standing required different handling than the adults. Consequently, the judgment was modified to uphold the relief for the adults while rejecting the minor's specific cassation arguments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may partially allow a cassation appeal when the grounds for dismissal apply to some plaintiffs but not others, permitting the court to rule on the merits for those whose appeal is admissible while dismissing it for those whose procedural standing is lacking.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal partial allowance legal capacity joint debt claim procedural standing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 155/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 października 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosław Bączyk w sprawie z powództwa A. K., P. K. oraz małoletniego J. K. reprezentowanego przez przedstawicieli ustawowych A. K. i P. K.‎przeciwko A. G. i D. G.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 14 października 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanych od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 8 października 2015 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną w stosunku do J. K.