Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 152/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether bank's debt claim is valid.

Case Number V CSK 152/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the plaintiff's cassation appeal against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the bank failed to prove the validity of the debt, while the bank contended the claim was fully substantiated. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the legal basis of the debt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine a crucial issue of law or fact essential for the decision.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance bank debt validity supreme court jurisdiction civil procedure law substantiation of claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 152/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 października 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Grela w sprawie z powództwa M. J.‎przeciwko (…) Bank S.A. w W.‎o zapłatę, ewentualnie ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnejw dniu 23 października 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 6 listopada 2019 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE