Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V CSK 138/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 138/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant to review the lower court's judgment on a debt claim. The defendant argued that the first-instance court erred in its legal assessment regarding the validity of the debt, while the plaintiff maintained the original ruling was correct. Consequently, the Court decided to remit the case for further examination rather than issuing a final decision on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law, remitting the case for further proceedings if the legal assessment requires clarification.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance legal assessment review debt claim dispute remittal for proceedings Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 138/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 17 listopada 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Maria Szulc w sprawie z powództwa M. W.‎przeciwko A. K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 17 listopada 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 23 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE