Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V CSK 134/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine acquisition of ownership by municipality against resident.

Case Number V CSK 134/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the Mayor of Town B against the lower court's decision. The dispute concerns whether the municipality acquired ownership of a property through prescription (acquisition by lapse of time) against the resident A.B. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the statutory conditions for acquisition by lapse of time were met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 143 § 1 k.c.; Art. 146 k.c.: The court established that a claim for acquisition of ownership by lapse of time must be examined by the court of first instance regarding the fulfillment of statutory requirements.

Keywords

AI generated
acquisition by lapse of time prescription of ownership municipal property rights cassation appeal admissibility civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 143 § 1 k.c.
Art. 146 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 134/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 17 grudnia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: Prezes SN Dariusz Zawistowski w sprawie z wniosku Gminy B.‎przy uczestnictwie Skarbu Państwa - Prezydenta Miasta B., ‎Spółdzielni Mieszkaniowej "[...]" w B. i A.B.‎o stwierdzenie zasiedzenia,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 17 grudnia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej uczestnika Skarbu Państwa - Prezydenta Miasta B. od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w B.‎z dnia 26 listopada 2019 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE