Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 134/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 134/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment in a debt payment dispute. The defendant argued that the lower courts erred in their legal assessment regarding the calculation of interest and the burden of proof. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination by a higher instance to resolve these legal questions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a violation of the law affecting the outcome of the proceedings, thereby remanding the case for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance violation of law debt payment dispute interest calculation error burden of proof allocation remittal for retrial civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 134/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 stycznia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z powództwa J. W.‎przeciwko M. W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 23 stycznia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 19 listopada 2018 r., sygn. akt V AGa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE