Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 133/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation complaints to be heard on civil debt dispute between individuals.

Case Number V CSK 133/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted both cassation complaints for examination regarding a civil debt dispute. The plaintiff and a third-party intervener challenged the appellate court's judgment on procedural grounds. The court decided to proceed with the review because the complaints raised issues requiring further legal analysis.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation complaints if they raise questions of law or fundamental procedural errors requiring further examination.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation procedure civil debt dispute third party intervention appellate judgment review procedural error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 382/14
Appeal court partially allowed claim for defective building materials, reducing damages and adjusting litigation costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 133/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 września 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Iwona Koper w sprawie z powództwa S. S. i W. S. przeciwko B. F. ‎z udziałem interwenienta ubocznego P. B. ‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 września 2015 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych: pozwanej i interwenienta ubocznego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach‎z dnia 22 września 2014 r., sygn. akt I ACa 382/14, przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE