Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 123/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 123/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerns a claim for payment between a limited liability company and an individual, where the lower court ruled in favor of the plaintiff. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the legal application was erroneous.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed an error in the application of substantive or procedural law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance error in application of law debt claim dispute limited liability company procedural review standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 123/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 20 września 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z powództwa P. Spółki Akcyjnej we W.‎przeciwko S. K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 20 września 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we […]‎z dnia 27 października 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.