Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 123/13 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether civil court properly applied law in debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 123/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendants against the appellate court's judgment. The defendants argued that the lower courts failed to correctly apply legal provisions regarding the calculation of interest and damages in their civil debt claim. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination to determine if the legal errors were substantial enough to warrant a new trial.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a material error in applying the law, necessitating a remittal for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance material error in law application civil debt dispute interest calculation error remittal for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 123/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 6 grudnia 2013 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Zbigniew Kwaśniewski w sprawie z powództwa E. D.‎przeciwko B. R. i S. K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 6 grudnia 2013 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanych od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 23 listopada 2012 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE