Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 112/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review civil compensation claim against company and individual defendant.

Case Number V CSK 112/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the lower court's judgment. The plaintiff sought monetary compensation from the defendant company and individual, arguing specific contractual or tort-based liabilities. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review the application of law or procedural violations when the lower court's decision requires further clarification or when the appeal raises significant legal issues necessitating a plenary review.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance civil compensation claim Supreme Court review procedural violation application of law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 112/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 5 września 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z powództwa E. B.‎przeciwko A. O. i S. Sp. z o.o. w K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 5 września 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w K.‎z dnia 10 sierpnia 2018 r., sygn. akt III Ca (...), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE