Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CO 79/13 AI generated

Plaintiff's divorce suit dismissed; court ruled the wrong court was designated for the divorce proceedings.

Case Number V CO 79/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's divorce action because the lower court designated the wrong venue. The plaintiff sued for divorce against the defendant, but the district court incorrectly identified the competent court based on a prior procedural order. The Supreme Court held that the divorce suit must be heard by the court where the defendant resides, not the one erroneously selected.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o rozwodzie; Art. 10 ust. 1 k.r.s.: A divorce suit must be filed at the court of the defendant's domicile, not the court erroneously designated by a prior procedural order.

Keywords

AI generated
divorce proceedings competent court venue designation defendant's domicile procedural error Supreme Court ruling civil jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o rozwodzie
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CO 79/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 sierpnia 2013 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z powództwa B. W.‎przeciwko M. W.‎o rozwód,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 28 sierpnia 2013 r.,‎wniosku Sądu Okręgowego w W. o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy, sygn. akt XIII RC […], oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w W. jako właściwy do rozpoznania sprawy. UZASADNIENIE