Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CO 67/14 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to recuse judges in inheritance dispute due to lack of bias evidence.

Case Number V CO 67/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's request to recuse the judges of the Court of Appeal in an inheritance dispute. The applicant alleged potential bias based on prior involvement in related proceedings, while the opposing party argued no grounds existed for recusal. The court found the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence of actual bias or conflict of interest to justify removing the judges.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o postępowaniu cywilnym, art. 238 § 1; art. 239 ust. 1: A request for recusal of judges is rejected when the applicant fails to demonstrate concrete evidence of bias or a specific conflict of interest that affects the impartiality of the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judges inheritance dispute conflict of interest impartiality requirement Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o postępowaniu cywilnym, art. 238 § 1
Ustawa o postępowaniu cywilnym, art. 239 ust. 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CO 67/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 15 maja 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z wniosku G. B.‎przy uczestnictwie H. O., H. W., W. K., S. M. i P. W.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia spadku,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 15 maja 2014 r.,‎wniosku wnioskodawczyni o wyłączenie sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]: […]ze sprawy o sygn. akt I ACz […], oddala wniosek. UZASADNIENIE