Supreme Court denies designation of court for divorce case citing contrary interpretation of jurisdiction rules.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court refused the request to designate a specific court for a divorce proceeding. The applicant argued for jurisdiction based on the defendant's residence, while the opposing party contended for the plaintiff's domicile. The court rejected the designation by applying a contrary interpretation of the relevant procedural article, ruling that no specific court should be assigned in this instance.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 45 § 2 k.p.c.; The court may refuse to designate a specific court for divorce proceedings when the statutory conditions for jurisdiction are not met or when a contrary interpretation of the law precludes such designation.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Sygn. akt V CO 32/21 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 11 marca 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Joanna Misztal-Konecka po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 11 marca 2021 r., wniosku T. J. o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy o rozwód, odmawia oznaczenia sądu właściwego (art. 45 § 2 k.p.c. a contrario).