Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CO 255/20 AI generated

Supreme Court denies designation of court under Art. 45 § 2 k.p.c. due to a contrario interpretation.

Case Number V CO 255/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court refused to designate a competent court for the case, citing Article 45 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The applicant requested a designation, but the Court applied a strict a contrario interpretation of the statutory provision. Consequently, the request for designation was rejected as the conditions for such an action were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 45 § 2 k.p.c.; The court may not designate a competent court if the statutory conditions for designation are not fulfilled, as the provision must be interpreted restrictively.

Keywords

AI generated
competent court designation a contrario interpretation Code of Civil Procedure jurisdictional dispute Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 45 § 2 k.p.c.
odmawia oznaczenia sądu właściwego (art. 45 § 2 a contrario k.p.c.) UZASADNIENIE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CO 255/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 7 stycznia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Paweł Grzegorczyk po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej ‎w dniu 7 stycznia 2021 r. sprawy z wniosku L. S.‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy. odmawia oznaczenia sądu właściwego (art. 45 § 2 a contrario k.p.c.) UZASADNIENIE