Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CO 24/21 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses divorce case due to lack of jurisdiction over the defendant's residence.

Case Number V CO 24/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the divorce petition because the lower court lacked jurisdiction over the defendant's residence. The plaintiff argued for jurisdiction based on the defendant's temporary location, while the defendant contested this by asserting their permanent residence was elsewhere. The court ruled that jurisdiction depends on the defendant's habitual residence, which was not established in the requested court's territory.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.: Jurisdiction over divorce cases is determined by the defendant's habitual residence; if the defendant's residence is unknown or cannot be established, the court must transfer the case to the competent court.

Keywords

AI generated
divorce jurisdiction habitual residence civil procedure code transfer of case defendant location

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CO 24/21 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 kwietnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz w sprawie z powództwa K. Ł.‎przeciwko M. Ł.‎o rozwód,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym ‎w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 kwietnia 2021 r.,‎wniosku Sądu Okręgowego w O. o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy o sygn. akt I C […], zwraca akta sprawy. UZASADNIENIE