Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CO 162/14 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to recuse judges due to lack of personal bias or conflict of interest.

Case Number V CO 162/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed G. B.'s request to recuse the judges of the Court of Appeal in a civil case. The applicant alleged potential bias but failed to demonstrate a specific personal interest or direct conflict with the judges. The court ruled that without concrete evidence of impartiality issues, the statutory grounds for recusal were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 229 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 230 § 1 k.p.c.: A request to recuse judges is denied when the applicant fails to prove a personal interest or a direct conflict of interest that compromises judicial impartiality.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judges impartiality requirement personal interest conflict of interest civil procedure law judicial bias Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 229 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 230 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CO 162/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 listopada 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 13 listopada 2014 r.,‎wniosku G. B. o wyłączenie sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]:‎[…]od rozpoznania sprawy I Co […] ( I ACo […]), oddala wniosek. UZASADNIENIE