Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CO 13/14 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses second judge recusal request in civil appeal case against state and prosecutor.

Case Number V CO 13/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff's second request to recuse all judges of the Court of Appeal in a civil dispute over payment. The plaintiff, M. B., sought removal of judges from the appellate court handling a case against the State Treasury and the Regional Prosecutor. The court found no valid grounds for recusal, noting the request was repetitive and lacked sufficient justification to warrant removing the entire bench.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 227 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 227 ust. 2 k.p.c.: A second request for recusal of all judges in an appeal case is dismissed if the first request was rejected and the new grounds are not sufficiently substantiated to justify removing the entire bench.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judges appeal court composition repeated recusal request civil procedure law state treasury dispute prosecutor involvement Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 227 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 227 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CO 13/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 31 stycznia 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z powództwa M. B.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa - Prezesowi Sądu Rejonowego w M. i Prokuratorowi Rejonowemu w M.‎o zapłatę,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 31 stycznia 2014 r.,‎wniosku powoda o wyłączenie sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]: […] od rozpoznania sprawy o sygn. akt I ACa […] odrzuca ponowny wniosek o wyłączenie wszystkich sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]. UZASADNIENIE