Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CO 104/15 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to recuse judges in divorce case due to lack of bias evidence.

Case Number V CO 104/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the applicant's request to recuse the judges of the Court of Appeal in a divorce proceeding. The applicant alleged potential bias but failed to provide sufficient evidence of a conflict of interest or improper conduct by the judges. Consequently, the court upheld the original panel's authority to continue hearing the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 231 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 232 § 1 k.p.c.: A request to recuse judges must be based on concrete facts demonstrating a real risk of bias; mere speculation or general allegations without specific evidence do not justify removing the judges from the case.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judges divorce proceedings conflict of interest bias in court Supreme Court ruling procedural fairness lack of evidence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 231 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 232 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CO 104/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 5 sierpnia 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 5 sierpnia 2015 r.,‎wniosku R. Ł.o wyłączenie sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]: […]‎od rozpoznania sprawy z powództwa M. Ł.‎przeciwko R. Ł.‎o rozwód, sygn. akt I ACa […] oddala wniosek. UZASADNIENIE