Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CNP 76/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal to review lower court's civil judgment for legal inconsistency.

Case Number V CNP 76/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the appeal filed by R. N. against a final civil judgment rendered by the District Court in J. on December 5, 2013. The District Court had ruled in favor of Z. K., ordering R. N. to pay a specific sum, while R. N. contested the legal basis of this decision. By admitting the case for examination, the Supreme Court indicated that the lower court's ruling may contain errors requiring further review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit an appeal against a final judgment if there are grounds to believe the lower court's decision is inconsistent with the law.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal admissibility final judgment review legal inconsistency civil procedure Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CNP 76/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 10 czerwca 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Bogumiła Ustjanicz w sprawie ze skargi R. N.o stwierdzenie niezgodności z prawem prawomocnego wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w J.‎z dnia 5 grudnia 2013 r., sygn. akt II Ca […],‎w sprawie z powództwa Z. K.‎przeciwko R. N.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 10 czerwca 2016 r., przyjmuje skargę do rozpoznania.