Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V CNP 5/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal against civil judgment regarding insurance payment dispute between insurer and insured.

Case Number V CNP 5/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the appeal filed by the insured against a final judgment from the District Court in K. The District Court had ruled in favor of the life insurance company, M. Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń na Życie i Reasekuracji S.A., ordering payment to the insured, E. O. The Court decided to proceed with the review because the appellant raised substantive legal arguments regarding the interpretation of the insurance contract terms and the scope of liability that require further examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court accepts an appeal when the lower court's judgment involves a dispute over the interpretation of a contract or the scope of liability, necessitating a review of the legal reasoning applied to the specific facts.

Keywords

AI generated
insurance contract interpretation scope of liability civil appeal procedure final judgment review insurance company liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CNP 5/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 30 czerwca 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie ze skargi E. O.‎o stwierdzenie niezgodności z prawem prawomocnego wyroku ‎Sądu Okręgowego w K. z dnia 27 października 2016 r., sygn. akt XIX Ga […]‎w sprawie z powództwa M. Towarzystwu Ubezpieczeń na Życie i Reasekuracji S.A. w W.‎przeciwko E. O.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 30 czerwca 2017 r., przyjmuje skargę do rozpoznania.