Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV KO 96/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses prosecution's request for retrial due to lack of statutory grounds for ex officio review.

Case Number IV KO 96/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court issued a ruling on December 31, 2024, declining to order a retrial for the defendant M.M. The prosecution argued for a new trial based on alleged procedural errors, but the court found no statutory basis for an ex officio review. Consequently, the final appeal judgment from November 2021 remains in full force and effect.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 389 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 390 § 1 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may order a retrial ex officio only if specific statutory grounds are met; absent such grounds, the request is rejected and the final judgment stands.

Keywords

AI generated
ex officio retrial procedural error final judgment Supreme Court criminal procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 389 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

IV KO 96/24 ZARZĄDZENIE Dnia 31 grudnia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Zbigniew Puszkarski zarządził: 1. zawiadomić – przez doręczenie niniejszego zarządzenia z pouczeniem o jego niezaskarżalności – skazanego M.M., iż nie stwierdzono podstaw do wznowienia z urzędu postępowania w jego sprawie, zakończonego prawomocnym wyrokiem Sądu Apelacyjnego w Białymstoku z dnia 30 listopada 2021 r., sygn. akt II AKa 129/21; 2. sprawę zakreślić w repertorium KO. [WB][a.ł]