Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV KO 28/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses retrial request as obviously unfounded due to lack of new evidence or procedural error.

Case Number IV KO 28/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the defendant's request for a retrial under Article 545 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant argued for a new trial based on alleged errors in the final judgment from 2015, but the court found no grounds for reopening the case. The decision rests on the clear conclusion that the request was obviously unfounded and lacked any basis for procedural review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.; The court may reject a retrial request if it is obviously unfounded, requiring the applicant to demonstrate specific grounds such as new evidence or procedural violations that were not apparent at the time of the original judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
retrial request obviously unfounded Criminal Procedure Code Supreme Court procedural error new evidence dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.
akt III K 57/14, na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł: odmówić przyjęcia wniosku wobec jego oczywistej bezzasadności.
art. 545 § 3 k.p.k
akt III K 57/14, na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

IV KO 28/24 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 kwietnia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Błaszczyk w sprawie z wniosku B. M. po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej w dniu 16 kwietnia 2024 r.‎wniosku skazanego o wznowienie postępowania zakończonego prawomocnym wyrokiem Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach z dnia 10 grudnia 2015 r., sygn. akt II AKa 462/15, utrzymującym w mocy wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Bielsku – Białej z dnia 15 września 2015 r., sygn. akt III K 57/14, na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł: odmówić przyjęcia wniosku wobec jego oczywistej bezzasadności. [PGW][ms]