Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV CSK 30/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number IV CSK 30/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the district court's judgment ordering payment. The core dispute involved the interpretation of contractual obligations and the calculation of damages between the plaintiff W. R. and the defendant L. K. The court decided to refer the case back for further examination because the lower court's application of the law regarding the specific debt terms required clarification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment is based on a misapplication of the law or a violation of the principle of equality before the law, necessitating a review of the legal reasoning.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance misapplication of law civil debt dispute contractual obligations Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt IV CSK 30/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 czerwca 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z powództwa W. R.‎przeciwko L. K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 23 czerwca 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w T.‎z dnia 2 lipca 2019 r., sygn. akt VIII Ca (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.