Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV CSK 15/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal in personal rights case against police officer for procedural error.

Case Number IV CSK 15/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the police officer. The plaintiff claimed a violation of personal rights, while the defendant argued the lower court's decision was correct. The court decided to refer the case for further examination due to identified procedural irregularities.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment violates the law or contains a procedural error affecting the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance procedural error review personal rights protection police officer liability Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt IV CSK 15/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 18 sierpnia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Roman Trzaskowski w sprawie z powództwa P. M.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa - Komendantowi Miejskiemu Policji w T.‎o ochronę dóbr osobistych,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 18 sierpnia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 23 lipca 2019 r., sygn. akt V ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.