Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III UO 2/18 AI generated

Supreme Court suspends appeal review due to conflicting lower court decisions on the same legal issue.

Case Number III UO 2/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court suspended the review of the appeal filed by D. A. J. against a prior ruling. The appellant challenged a decision regarding social security benefits, but the Court identified a conflict in lower court interpretations of the same legal provisions. Consequently, the Court decided to postpone the final judgment until the conflicting decisions are resolved.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 379 ust. 1 KPA; Art. 380 KPA: When a final judgment is challenged and the Court of Cassation finds that the lower courts have issued conflicting decisions on the same legal issue, it must suspend the proceedings to resolve the conflict before making a final ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of proceedings conflicting judgments Court of Cassation social security benefits legal uniformity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 379 ust. 1 KPA
Art. 380 KPA

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III UO 2/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 sierpnia 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Katarzyna Gonera (przewodniczący)‎SSN Bohdan Bieniek‎SSN Piotr Prusinowski (sprawozdawca) w sprawie zażalenia D. A. J.na postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 2 sierpnia 2018 r., sygn. akt III UZP 4/18, po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych odracza rozpoznanie zażalenia.