Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III PUB 6/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding police pension due to lack of impartiality and independence of the judge.

Case Number III PUB 6/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the appellant's request to examine the impartiality and independence of Judge Jarosław Sobuta. The appellant argued that the judge failed to meet neutrality requirements in the pension dispute. The court dismissed the appeal because the specific grounds for questioning the judge's independence were not substantiated.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 240 ust. 1 k.p.c.: A request to examine a judge's impartiality is rejected if the appellant fails to provide sufficient evidence of a conflict of interest or lack of independence.

Keywords

AI generated
police pension judicial impartiality independence of judge appeal dismissal neutrality requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 240 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III PUB 6/24 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 25 kwietnia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Piotr Telusiewicz w sprawie z odwołania S. D.‎od decyzji Dyrektora Zakładu Emerytalno - Rentowego Ministerstwa Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji w Warszawie‎o wysokość emerytury policyjnej,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w dniu 25 kwietnia 2024 r.,‎wniosku odwołującego się o zbadanie spełnienia wymogów bezstronności i niezawisłości SSN Jarosława Sobutki odrzuca wniosek. [SOP] [ms]