Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III KO 51/19 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed retrial request under Art. 545 § 3 K.P.K. due to lack of new evidence.

Case Number III KO 51/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court refused the applicant's request for a retrial based on Article 545 § 3 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant argued that new evidence existed, but the court found no grounds to reopen the final judgment. Consequently, the request was rejected because the statutory conditions for a retrial were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.; A retrial request is inadmissible if the applicant fails to prove the existence of new evidence that could have influenced the outcome of the final judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
retrial request new evidence Criminal Procedure Code final judgment Supreme Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.
III KZ 12/19, na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł odmówić przyjęcia wniosku o wznowienie postępowania.
art. 545 § 3 k.p.k
III KZ 12/19, na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III KZ 12/19
Supreme Court dismissed appeal against refusal to reinstate personal petition for retrial due to procedural defects.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III KO 51/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 7 listopada 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Michał Laskowski w sprawie A. W.po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w dniu 7 listopada 2019 r. wniosku A. W. o wznowienie postępowania zakończonego przed Sądem Najwyższym w sprawie o sygn. III KZ 12/19, na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł odmówić przyjęcia wniosku o wznowienie postępowania.