Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III KK 362/20 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses defense request to suspend execution of criminal sentence under Art. 532 § 1 K.P.K. a contrario.

Case Number III KK 362/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the defense's request to suspend the execution of a criminal sentence. The defense argued for a suspension based on the defendant's age and the nature of the offense, while the prosecution contended that the statutory conditions were not met. The court decided against the request because the specific legal requirements for suspension were not satisfied in this instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 532 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 282 k.k.: The court held that a request to suspend the execution of a criminal sentence is inadmissible when the statutory prerequisites for such suspension are not fulfilled, even if the defendant argues for leniency based on personal circumstances.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of sentence criminal execution defense request statutory prerequisites Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 532 § 1 k.p.k.
akt II K […] na podstawie art. 532 § 1 k.p.k. a contrario p o s t a n o w i ł nie uwzględnić wniosku.
Art. 282 k.k.
skazanego z art. 282 k.k. i in.
art. 282 k.k
skazanego z art. 282 k.k.
art. 532 § 1 k.p.k
akt II K […] na podstawie art. 532 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III KK 362/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 grudnia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marek Motuk w sprawie A.M. skazanego z art. 282 k.k. i in. po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej w dniu 21 grudnia 2020 r. na posiedzeniu bez udziału stron wniosku obrońcy skazanego o wstrzymanie wykonania wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w R. z dnia 31 marca 2020 r., sygn. akt V Ka […], utrzymującego w mocy wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w R. z dnia 26 listopada 2019 r., sygn. akt II K […] na podstawie art. 532 § 1 k.p.k. a contrario p o s t a n o w i ł nie uwzględnić wniosku.