Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CSK 9/21 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether bank's claim for damages is substantiated.

Case Number III CSK 9/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the bank against the appellate court's judgment. The bank argued that the defendants failed to prove they acted without fault regarding the alleged financial loss. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the bank's claim meets the required legal standards for liability.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 366 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment violates the law or fails to examine a crucial issue, requiring the case to be remanded for further proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance bank liability claim fault requirement financial damages civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 366 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 9/21 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 kwietnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Paweł Grzegorczyk w sprawie z powództwa Banku (…) S.A. w W.‎przeciwko B. B. i M. B.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 23 kwietnia 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 30 lipca 2020 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE