Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CSK 75/15 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal in debt collection case where defendants successfully argued statute of limitations. The court rejects the plaintiff's claim for payment. The appeal is dismissed due to the expiration of the limitation period. The court rejects the plaintiff's claim for payment. The appeal is dismissed due to the expiration of the limitation period.

Case Number III CSK 75/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought payment from the defendants, who successfully argued that the claim was time-barred under the Civil Code. The court upheld the dismissal, ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove the claim was within the statutory limitation period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 245 k.c.; Art. 246 k.c.: A claim for payment is extinguished if the limitation period has expired and the plaintiff cannot prove the claim was timely filed.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations civil code provisions extinguishment of claim cassation appeal dismissal burden of proof

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 245 k.c.
Art. 246 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 75/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 4 maja 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Gudowski w sprawie z powództwa M. R.‎przeciwko J. M. i M. M.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 4 maja 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanych od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 15 października 2014 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], umarza postępowanie kasacyjne i oddala wniosek powódki o zasądzenie kosztów postępowania kasacyjnego.