Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 293/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine procedural errors in road authority compensation case.

Case Number III CSK 293/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower courts failed to properly assess the damages and procedural requirements for compensation from the road authority. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to address these alleged procedural deficiencies.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a procedural error affecting the outcome of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance procedural error review road authority compensation civil procedure law Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 293/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 maja 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak w sprawie z powództwa P. S.A. w G. ‎przeciwko Województwu (…) Zarządowi Dróg Wojewódzkich w K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 8 maja 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 29 kwietnia 2019 r., sygn. akt I AGa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE