Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 174/16 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal against civil judgment regarding payment dispute between companies.

Case Number III CSK 174/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the appellant company against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute involved a claim for payment between R. s.r.o. and S. S. i M. S., with the appellate court having previously ruled in favor of the defendants. The court decided to proceed with the review because the cassation complaint raised significant legal issues requiring further examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the judgment violates the law or contains a significant error in the application of law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance civil procedure law payment dispute appellate judgment review legal error correction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 174/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 lipca 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosław Bączyk w sprawie z powództwa R. s.r.o. z siedzibą w Český Těšin‎przeciwko S. S. i M. S.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 14 lipca 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanych od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie‎z dnia 13 listopada 2015 r., sygn. akt I ACa1000/15, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.